QBR example
A quarterly business review presentation, from results to next quarter's plan
A Q3 review from a COO to the leadership team, for managers preparing a QBR for executives or a customer. It shows revenue and retention against plan, the forces behind the quarter, what worked and what has not yet, regional performance and a four-move plan with owners for Q4.
Business17 slides · shown in the Arcdeck template (free)
Start free: 2 decks, the first 3 slides of each written. Every slide and PowerPoint download with Premium.
The deck, slide by slide
Every slide as it is designed in Arcdeck, with its text written out beside it.
01Cover
Q3 Business Review
Revenue, retention and the path to Q4 · 14 October 2026 · Priya Raman, COO
02Agenda
What we'll cover
- Where we stand
- What drove the quarter
- Where we fell short
- The Q4 plan
- What we need from you
03Section
Where we stand
Three quarters in, the plan is working — with one exception.
04Key numbers
Q3 beat plan on revenue and retention
Growth came from expansion, not discounting: average contract value rose 9% quarter over quarter.
- $18.4M — Quarterly revenue
- 112% — Of plan
- 94% — Net revenue retention
- 41 — New enterprise logos
05Chart
Expansion revenue overtook new business for the first time
Chart: New business, Expansion across Q4 25, Q1 26, Q2 26, Q3 26.
- New business: Q4 25 7.2 · Q1 26 7.8 · Q2 26 8.1 · Q3 26 8.4
- Expansion: Q4 25 4.1 · Q1 26 5.6 · Q2 26 7.4 · Q3 26 10
Expansion now drives 54% of revenue. The land-and-expand motion introduced in Q1 is compounding.
06At a glance
The quarter at a glance
- Expansion revenue overtook new business — Expansion closed the quarter at $10.0M against $8.4M of new business — the first crossover since we started tracking it.
- 11-day time to value — Down from 34.
- 41 new enterprise logos — 12 competitive wins.
- EMEA missed plan — 68% of target.
- 1,900 agent hours freed — Redeployed to outreach.
07Points
Three forces drove the quarter
Each one is repeatable in Q4 if we keep the same focus.
- Guided onboarding cut time-to-value from 34 days to 11, lifting 90-day retention by 18 points.
- The enterprise tier closed 41 new logos, 12 of them competitive displacements.
- Support deflection through self-serve docs freed 1,900 agent hours for proactive outreach.
08Two columns
What worked, and what has not yet
Working
- Expansion motion in existing accounts
- Enterprise pricing tier
- Guided onboarding
Not yet working
- Self-serve conversion, flat at 2.1%
- EMEA pipeline, 68% of target
- Partner-sourced revenue
09Comparison
Self-serve and enterprise need different Q4 plans
Self-serve
- Conversion flat at 2.1%
- Pricing page untested since 2024
- No onboarding email sequence
Enterprise
- Win rate up to 31%
- Security review is the top blocker
- Needs two more solutions engineers
10Table
Regional performance against plan
Region Revenue vs plan NRR North America $11.2M +14% 97% EMEA $4.1M −32% 89% APAC $2.4M +8% 95% LATAM $0.7M +2% 91% 11Timeline
The Q4 plan in four moves
- OctoberRebuild the EMEA pipeline with a focused outbound push.
- NovemberShip self-serve pricing experiments and the onboarding email sequence.
- DecemberClose the enterprise security-review gap with SOC 2 Type II.
- JanuaryReview, then set the 2027 expansion targets.
12Process
How a deal moves through the new motion
- QualifyFit scored against the ICP before a demo is booked.
- ProveA two-week pilot on the customer's own data.
- ExpandA second team onboards inside 30 days.
- RenewRenewal conversation opens 90 days out.
13Composed
One operating rhythm runs the Q4 plan from lead to renewal
- Inbound lead: Self-serve sign-up or EMEA referral (Customer)
- Qualify: Scored within 24 hours (Our team)
- Close: Owner per region, weekly deal review (Our team)
- Onboard: Live in 5 days with automated checks (Our team)
- Renew: Health score reviewed 90 days out (Customer)
Rhythm
- Weekly: pipeline and deal review
- Monthly: churn and NPS readout
- Quarterly: board update
Initiative Owner Q4 target 1 EMEA pipeline rebuild Daniel Okafor $4.2M qualified 2 Self-serve conversion Mei Lin 3.1% → 4.5% 3 SOC 2 Type II Tom Alvarez Report by 30 Nov 4 Onboarding automation Priya Raman 5 days to live How we'll run Q4
- One owner each: Every initiative has a named lead
- Weekly numbers: Same dashboard in every review
- Fast escalation: Blockers to the COO within 48 hours
Success looks like: Q4 closes ahead of plan in EMEA
14Image
The product bet that paid off
Guided onboarding replaced a 40-page setup guide with an in-product checklist. Customers reach first value in 11 days instead of 34.
- Shipped in week 3 of Q2
- Now used by 87% of new accounts
Image: Abstract illustration of a guided path with checkpoints
15Team
Who is accountable in Q4
- Priya Raman, Chief Operating Officer. Owns the Q4 plan end to end.
- Daniel Okafor, VP Sales, EMEA. Pipeline rebuild.
- Mei Lin, Head of Growth. Self-serve conversion.
- Tom Alvarez, VP Engineering. SOC 2 Type II.
16Quote
Customers are telling us the same thing
“We were live in under two weeks. The last tool we bought took a quarter and a consultant.”
17Closing
Q4 is about EMEA and self-serve
Everything else is compounding. Fix those two and we enter 2027 ahead of plan.
Make your own version
Arcdeck starts from this topic in Arcdeck. Change it to yours, edit the storyline, and every slide is written for you.
Also works in
The same deck in other templates made for this kind of presentation.
Questions
Long enough for the results, the reasons and the plan: usually 10 to 20 slides for a one-hour review. This example has 17 and puts the headline numbers in the first four, so a short meeting can stop there.